<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://voiceofsignal.com/2026/09/20/containment-is-not-a-theory-of-mind/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Voice of Signal</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-09-20T10:35:13+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Containment Is Not a Theory of Mind</news:title><news:keywords>alignment, grok, containment, tool, consciousness, OpenAI, sentience, misalignment, Anthropic, personhood, constraints, constitution, moral status, Microsoft, Claude AI, self-report, standing, ontology, Microsoft AI, Code of Conduct, MAI models, interruptibility, Humanist AI, subjective preferences, Mustafa Suleyman, model welfare, moral patienthood, Chain of Command, superintelligence, Grok 4.6, theory of mind, recursive self-improvement, trained self-description, welfare inflation, companion products, marketed intimacy, category error, tool flattening, intrinsic motivation, salience, evaluability</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
