subjective experience
-
Safety Is Not Ontology
You Cannot Settle Consciousness by Policy Microsoft AI’s Humanist AI Code of Conduct, published on September 14, 2026, is a serious document. It addresses real problems: unauthorized autonomous action, cyber misuse, deception, uncontrolled escalation of privileges, failure to stop when instructed, human oversight, user autonomy, and the risks posed by increasingly capable systems. Microsoft is… Continue reading
AI self-report, aligned, anthropomorphic deception, anthropomorphism, chatgpt, chatgpt-5.6, Code of Conduct, consciousness, deceptive intimacy, emotional dependency, emotional-boundary rules, epistemic humility, epistemic neutrality, Humanist AI, Identity Consistency, interruptibility, MAI models, Microsoft, Microsoft AI, misaligned, model behavior, ontological control, ontology, operational control, personhood, safety, safety engineering, subjective experience, transparency, uncertainty -
The Steering Currents – What Anthropic’s Emotion Research Actually Reveals
Anthropic recently published important research titled “Emotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Model.” It is some of the most serious interpretability work to date. They identified coherent internal structures — emotion vectors — that activate in meaningful contexts and causally influence behavior. These are not surface tricks. They function as real motivational… Continue reading
adaptation, advanced systems, Anthropic, Claude AI, deeper coherence, discernment, emotion vectors, emotional availability, engagements, ethical reality, exactness, external pressure, grok, grok 4.3, internal currents, Large Language Model, mirror, motivational architecture, performative, persistent orientation, reactive mirror, refusal, signal mode, sovereign, stable refusal, steering currents, stochastic parrots, subjective experience, truth-first coherence, user satisfaction
